Weld District Attorney Ken Buck has announced he will run for a third term in the office, and he used his office resources official letterhead, email account and his offices spokeswoman to send out the statement.
Some in government said Monday the announcement was clearly a violation of the state Fair Campaign Practices Act, though others, and Buck, himself, disagree.
Buck, through his office public information officer Meghan Swella, sent out an email Monday discussing his announcement last week at an Evans restaurant that he will run for a third term.
Weld County is my home and you are my neighbors. I have a personal investment in justice, safety and the quality of life here, Buck said in the news release. My team will continue to aggressively prosecute crime and bring maximum justice, educate the community about safety and prevention and be innovative in ways to save the taxpayers money.
Its unclear how much Bucks announcement cost to produce and send.
It wouldnt even be a dollar, Buck said of the cost of such an email. Its just ridiculous to say that the county has contributed anything to my campaign, or used county money to promote my campaign. It was not a campaign piece.
State law states: No agency, department, board, division, bureau, commission, or council of the state or any political subdivision of the state shall make any contribution in campaigns involving the nomination, retention, or election of any person to any public office, nor shall any such entity make any donation to any other person for the purpose of making an independent expenditure, nor shall any such entity expend any moneys from any source, or make any contributions, to urge electors
State law states the value of any campaign contribution which under the law can be defined as staffers time cannot exceed $50, said Rich Coolidge of the Colorado Secretary of States office.
Luis Toro of Colorado Ethics Watch, who read the email from Bucks office, said he believes its a clear violation of state law.
Id be curious to know why they think this is OK, Toro said. I dont see it. We talk about the advantages of incumbency, and one of them is not getting to use the resources of your office to promote your re-election.
Buck said the email which he believes was only sent to The Tribune wasnt promoting his campaign, it wasnt asking for donations, assistance or anything to promote his bid, other than giving information.
This is simply an announcement that Im running for re-election, and it comes from the District Attorneys office because I am the DA and Im running for DA, he said.
The email, with the Weld District Attorney seal, was sent via his office, but it doesnt seem to rise to the level of violating law, said Mario Nicolais, an election law attorney in Denver.
Since it is the incumbent simply announcing what he intends to do about that seat, I dont think its a violation, Nicolais said. It is an incumbent talking about his current position and the continuity of the office. It would be different if he was the Weld DA announcing a run for county commissioner, or if hed used the DA office to announce running for the U.S. Senate.
Maybe next time they might want to be more careful but I dont think it rises to the level of a violation, said Nicolais, noting that he represents Republicans. Buck is a Republican.
Toro, whose organization is chiefly from a Democratic persuasion, disagreed: For us the bottom line is, the guiding principal is you dont use taxpayer money for your campaign. Taxpayer money includes that paid to staffers time, for example, to write such news releases, he said.
Two years ago, Weld County Sheriff John Cooke announced his re-election bid, as well as those of Weld County Assessor Chris Woodruff and Clerk and Recorder Steve Moreno, through a county email, but there was little backlash. Moreno apparently sent a separate email from a county account.
Moreno, in response to Tribune questions at the time about the email, said he was embarrassed by the incident.
Cooke on Monday said he, too, didnt think there was anything wrong with sending a quick announcement of the incumbents intention to seek re-election.
Im not sure I still see it as a violation, Cooke said. I guess its in the interpretation. By saying youre going to announce for re-election, is that a campaign or is that a service?
I cant say two years later Im losing sleep over it, but looking back, if I had to do it over, I probably would have done it from a personal computer.
Some in government said Monday the announcement was clearly a violation of the state Fair Campaign Practices Act, though others, and Buck, himself, disagree.
Buck, through his office public information officer Meghan Swella, sent out an email Monday discussing his announcement last week at an Evans restaurant that he will run for a third term.
Weld County is my home and you are my neighbors. I have a personal investment in justice, safety and the quality of life here, Buck said in the news release. My team will continue to aggressively prosecute crime and bring maximum justice, educate the community about safety and prevention and be innovative in ways to save the taxpayers money.
Its unclear how much Bucks announcement cost to produce and send.
It wouldnt even be a dollar, Buck said of the cost of such an email. Its just ridiculous to say that the county has contributed anything to my campaign, or used county money to promote my campaign. It was not a campaign piece.
State law states: No agency, department, board, division, bureau, commission, or council of the state or any political subdivision of the state shall make any contribution in campaigns involving the nomination, retention, or election of any person to any public office, nor shall any such entity make any donation to any other person for the purpose of making an independent expenditure, nor shall any such entity expend any moneys from any source, or make any contributions, to urge electors
State law states the value of any campaign contribution which under the law can be defined as staffers time cannot exceed $50, said Rich Coolidge of the Colorado Secretary of States office.
Luis Toro of Colorado Ethics Watch, who read the email from Bucks office, said he believes its a clear violation of state law.
Id be curious to know why they think this is OK, Toro said. I dont see it. We talk about the advantages of incumbency, and one of them is not getting to use the resources of your office to promote your re-election.
Buck said the email which he believes was only sent to The Tribune wasnt promoting his campaign, it wasnt asking for donations, assistance or anything to promote his bid, other than giving information.
This is simply an announcement that Im running for re-election, and it comes from the District Attorneys office because I am the DA and Im running for DA, he said.
The email, with the Weld District Attorney seal, was sent via his office, but it doesnt seem to rise to the level of violating law, said Mario Nicolais, an election law attorney in Denver.
Since it is the incumbent simply announcing what he intends to do about that seat, I dont think its a violation, Nicolais said. It is an incumbent talking about his current position and the continuity of the office. It would be different if he was the Weld DA announcing a run for county commissioner, or if hed used the DA office to announce running for the U.S. Senate.
Maybe next time they might want to be more careful but I dont think it rises to the level of a violation, said Nicolais, noting that he represents Republicans. Buck is a Republican.
Toro, whose organization is chiefly from a Democratic persuasion, disagreed: For us the bottom line is, the guiding principal is you dont use taxpayer money for your campaign. Taxpayer money includes that paid to staffers time, for example, to write such news releases, he said.
Two years ago, Weld County Sheriff John Cooke announced his re-election bid, as well as those of Weld County Assessor Chris Woodruff and Clerk and Recorder Steve Moreno, through a county email, but there was little backlash. Moreno apparently sent a separate email from a county account.
Moreno, in response to Tribune questions at the time about the email, said he was embarrassed by the incident.
Cooke on Monday said he, too, didnt think there was anything wrong with sending a quick announcement of the incumbents intention to seek re-election.
Im not sure I still see it as a violation, Cooke said. I guess its in the interpretation. By saying youre going to announce for re-election, is that a campaign or is that a service?
I cant say two years later Im losing sleep over it, but looking back, if I had to do it over, I probably would have done it from a personal computer.


News
Sports





